Internal commentary for books
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Medium priority
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
E.g. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/history/frrant/work/216/
Primarily for users to discuss alternative ordering and possible reasons for this.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the example at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/history/frrant/work/216/ and the current book-related behavior in the repository. Clarify how users should add and view internal commentary about alternative ordering and possible reasons. Done means the intended discussion workflow is defined and implemented for book entries.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100