inconsistent naming of setup() and set_up()
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 160
- Forks
- 113
- Avg merge
- 12d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
we should use set_up() everywhere
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the repository for both setup() and set_up() to identify all definitions and call sites. Determine the project’s consistent naming convention from the existing occurrences, then update the inconsistent names and verify that the project still builds and its checks pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100