UCL-ARC / UCL-ARC/mkdocs-rc-docs
General colour scheme brightness/lightness/contrast review
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rich Text Format
- Stars
- 41
- Forks
- 22
- Avg merge
- 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 14
Description
Even though some of the colours across the site don't fail accessibility review, they may not be sufficiently contrasting for good readability. This is an issue for taking a general look at the colour scheme and indicating areas we think could use improvement.
It is not an issue for bike-shedding over e.g. whether you think purple is a good colour. (It is.)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the site's colour scheme against readability and accessibility contrast guidance. Record the areas that need improvement without turning the issue into a preference debate; done means the review identifies concrete contrast and readability improvements.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- accessibility, design, documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100