Your licenses seem to be contraditory
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- SCSS
- Stars
- 212
- Forks
- 143
- Avg merge
- 1h 47m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 19
Description
The MIT license and the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license seem to have conflicting statements that makes it difficult for me to understand if I need to follow both licenses or if your intention was to allow me to choose which license to follow.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the repository's MIT license and Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license statements, then determine whether they are intended to apply together or as alternatives. This issue is resolved when the licensing guidance clearly explains what users must follow, but the required wording and ownership decision are not specified here.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100