TimelyDataflow / TimelyDataflow/differential-dataflow
what different with flink Retraction
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 3k
- Forks
- 211
- Avg merge
- 10h 42m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 34
Description
I saw flink has dynamic table, use retration .
is it has different wiht differential dataflow ?
Does he refer to your design ？
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by comparing Flink dynamic-table retraction semantics with differential dataflow's existing documentation and examples. Done would mean a clear, project-backed explanation of whether the designs differ and whether Flink's approach influenced this project.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- distributed-systems, stream-processing
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100