Thinkmill / Thinkmill/keystatic
gracefully handle `footnoteReference` and `footnoteDefinition` nodes in mdx field
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 2.4k
- Forks
- 159
- Avg merge
- 21h 41m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
currently, when an mdx document has a footnote, the keystatic mdx field errors with the following error message:
Field validation failed: content: Unexpected error: Error: Unhandled type footnoteReference Unhandled type footnoteDefinition
mdx document used:
---
title: test
---
Some text.[^1]
[^1]: Footnote content.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the MDX field validation path and reproduce the failure using the footnote-containing document shown in the issue. Trace how footnoteReference and footnoteDefinition nodes are handled; done means the document validates without the unhandled-type error.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- markdown, typescript
- Domain
- content
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100