Test-More / Test-More/test-more
Introduce "maybe" for possibly missing fields
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Perl
- Stars
- 149
- Forks
- 98
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Either use maybe for both the meanings:
maybe(field xxx => 1); # field doesn't have to exist, but if it's there, it must be 1
field xxx => maybe(1); # field must exist, the value might be undef or 1
Or use
maybe_field xxx => 1;
field xxx => maybe 1;
Similarly, item with maybe might either mean a value that's not present at all, or is present as undef or the value (makes a bit less sense than the hash case).
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are mentioned. First clarify whether “maybe” applies to missing fields, undef values, or both, and whether the same semantics should apply to items; done means an agreed syntax and behavior with corresponding tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- perl
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100