Quiz open-ended grading needs more than a score
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 8
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
If an open-ended answer gets 70/100, I need to know why. It would be much more useful to show missing points, what was correct, what was vague, and a better sample answer. Otherwise the score feels a bit arbitrary.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named in the issue. Start by locating the open-ended grading flow and determine how scores are produced; done should include explanations of missing and correct points, vague parts, and a better sample answer alongside the score.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100