Verify evals on Papers with Code
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 99
- Forks
- 10
- Avg merge
- 13h 31m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Hi,
Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!
I've made the paper and 2 paper-native evaluations available on Papers with Code.
The paper is part of the Computer Use Agents task page.
The UI-Mate-27B result currently ranks first on WindowsAgentArena (50 steps).
Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected?
You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.
If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):
Kind regards,
Niels
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Papers with Code paper page, its two paper-native evaluations, the Computer Use Agents task page, and the WindowsAgentArena leaderboard result. Verify the score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata against the paper, then report any corrections or confirm that the repository README can showcase the live result badges.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100