TIGER-AI-Lab / TIGER-AI-Lab/FIM-Midtraining
Verify evals on Papers with Code
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 20
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hi,
Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!
I've made the paper and 1 paper-native evaluation available on Papers with Code.
The paper is part of the Coding Agents task page.
Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected? The imported rows are tied to the paper or its official release artifacts; comparison-table baselines were not added.
You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.
Kind regards,
Niels
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked paper and its Papers with Code results page, then compare the imported scores, model names, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata with the paper and official release artifacts. Done means reporting any corrections needed or confirming that the entries are accurate; the issue provides no repository file or test to run.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100