Verify evals on Papers with Code
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 8.5k
- Forks
- 1.3k
- Avg merge
- 5h 36m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 22
Description
Hi,
Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!
I've made the paper and 15 paper-native evaluations available on Papers with Code.
The paper has results on Coding Agents, Language Modeling, World Knowledge, and 2 additional task pages.
The GLM-5.2 results currently rank third on AIME 2026 and HMMT Feb 2026.
Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected?
You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.
If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):
Kind regards,
Niels
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Open the linked Papers with Code paper and inspect its 15 paper-native evaluations, including the AIME 2026 and HMMT Feb 2026 results. Compare the score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata with the paper, then report any corrections or confirm that the entries are accurate.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- huggingface
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100