SpikeInterface / SpikeInterface/spikeinterface

Letting Lupin pass job kwargs to motion correction.

Open
#4,475 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

sorters
Dominant language
Python
Stars
847
Forks
280
Avg merge
3d 9h
Merged PRs (30d)
29

Description

Hello,
I'm testing the Lupin sorter, and it seems that the motion correction step does not use parallelization.

Start correct_motion()
...
noise_level (no parallelization): 100%|██████████| 20/20 [00:08<00:00,  2.29it/s]
detect and localize (no parallelization):   0%| 

is that expected?
The subsequent steps are fine.
Would it be possible to have Lupin pass job kwargs to motion correction?
Thanks

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start at the Lupin sorter entry point and trace its correct_motion() call, comparing it with the subsequent steps that already use parallelization. Done means Lupin can pass job kwargs into motion correction so that step no longer reports no parallelization; verify the behavior using the project’s existing coverage for this path.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
data
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.