RDFXML n3 Pane redesign (ideas)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 106
- Forks
- 52
- Avg merge
- 13h 35m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
Created this ticket from @bourgeoa comment on another ticket I closed so it didn't get lost.
RDFXML.pane like n3 pane are not éditable. They just offer different RDF serilisation of parsing a Resource.
Questions:
for what purpose ?
shall we add jsonld
for html Resources shall we give access to RDFA, data-islands ?
Also, wondering the intention with these panes as well as the internal pane, data content, human readable, pad pane, schedule pane, imagepane and formpane as I didn't see them in the new design.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by examining the RDFXML.pane and n3 pane, then compare them with the listed internal, data content, human readable, pad, schedule, image and form panes. The issue raises open questions about purpose, editability, JSON-LD, RDFa, data islands and the new design, but does not define a finished outcome.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100