SocketCluster / SocketCluster/socketcluster
vertical scaling with sc-broker
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 6.2k
- Forks
- 318
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi,
I apologize for using issues to ask a question. I am new to SC and am trying to wrap my head around the framework.. My use case is a chat with multiple workers on a vertically scaled machine. I would like to persist shared data from the chat in memory, so that if a client drops they can catch up with lost messages. Would I store the data using sc-broker? If so is there an example I can reference that has multiple workers with a central shared memory store?
Thank you so much!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are mentioned. Start with the sc-broker documentation and existing examples, then determine whether it supports shared in-memory state across vertically scaled workers and whether a multi-worker chat example exists; document the supported approach or clarify its limitations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript, node.js
- Domain
- distributed-systems, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100