Sienna-Platform / Sienna-Platform/PowerOperationsModels.jl
`ActivePower` lower bound under `PowerLoadDispatch`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1d 16h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 26
Description
PowerLoadDispatch and PowerLoadInterruption are intended to be distinct: the second lets you turn the load off, whereas the second only lets you throttle it back. At the moment, though, they're functionally identical. The only lower bound we put on active power is 0.0, so you're free to throttle it back until it's basically off.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the definitions or entry points for PowerLoadDispatch and PowerLoadInterruption, then inspect how their active-power lower bounds are set. Compare the relevant tests or add coverage for the distinction described in the issue: dispatch should not be able to reduce active power to effectively zero, while interruption can. The exact intended lower bound is not specified here.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100