Should we support `ActiveRecord::Store`?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 873
- Forks
- 164
- Avg merge
- 4d 27m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
Our application uses ActiveRecord::Store, but Tapioca does not support it, so we had to write a shim. I began investigating adding it, but while looking for where to implement it I discovered we support ActiveRecord::TypedStore.
Before I go any further, I'd like to establish the project's stance:
- Are we open to supporting
ActiveRecord::Store, or - do we recommend consumers use
ActiveRecord::TypedStoreinstead?
I should note that I only found out about TypedStore because I looked into adding support for Store. If we prefer one over the other, we could, for example, log a message if we detect the host app uses ActiveRecord::Store advising they switch.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No implementation file or test is named. Start by reviewing how the existing ActiveRecord::TypedStore support is implemented and compare it with the requested ActiveRecord::Store support; done means recording a clear project decision and corresponding guidance for consumers.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rails, ruby
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100