Nested packages private by default
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 1.9k
- Forks
- 121
- Avg merge
- 2m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Currently, all nested packages are accessible by any other package. We may want to reconsider this model so that nested packages are not "exported" by default, unless explicitly requested by the parent package:
# tree
.
└── foo
├── package.yml
└── bar
└── package.yml
# cat foo/package.yml
enforce_privacy: true
enforce_dependencies: true
dependencies:
- "foo/bar"
export_packages:
- "foo/bar"
This would allow those who depend on foo to be able to also access bar, otherwise any access to or dependency on bar would be a violation. If we want to export a subset of bar to the rest of the world, we would use aliasing:
# cat foo/app/public/foo/stuff.rb
module Foo
Stuff = ::Foo::Bar::Stuff
end
We've briefly described a project where packages could put more constraints on incoming edges (in the dependency graph).
@thegedge sees two possibilities for those constraints: a whitelist option or a blacklist option (not both). In this case, we would whitelist the parent package in the nested package, which means any other package would be a violation.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the package.yml examples and the aliasing example in foo/app/public/foo/stuff.rb to understand the proposed privacy and export model. Review existing package dependency enforcement and decide the constraint semantics before defining what tests would demonstrate that nested packages are private by default and explicitly exported packages remain accessible.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100