SciML / SciML/RecursiveArrayTools.jl
retcode field in DiffEqArray
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 233
- Forks
- 76
- Avg merge
- 2h 17m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
As discussed in Slack. DiffEqArray is a convenient way to reduce Solution type and wrap (u,t) results, it seems reasonable to add optional retcode field to DiffEqArray. What do you think? My current setup is: I run ensemble simulations and reduce each simulation to a DiffEqArray storing just (u,t) . Some parameters sets may result in Unstable retcode or Terminated if some termination criteria is present. To filter such simulations I define a solution type like
struct MySol
sol::DiffEqArray
retcode::Symbol
end
to save both solution and it's retcode
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the DiffEqArray definition and its construction and use sites. The issue proposes an optional retcode field for reduced ensemble solutions; done means DiffEqArray can preserve that status while retaining its existing (u,t) representation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100