SciML / SciML/ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl
It would be nice to have `ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.Blocks.RealOutput()` with variable `y` instead of `u`. Can we?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 171
- Forks
- 49
- Avg merge
- 15h 50m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
In the library inside the module Blocks, we have RealInput() and RealOutput() causal models. Both have variables u. However, at least in control literature here in the Nordics, I have seen using u for input and y for output. It would be nice to have RealOutput() with variable y. Can we? `
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start in the Blocks module by locating the definitions of RealInput() and RealOutput(), then inspect how the output variable is referenced elsewhere. Compare the requested y naming with existing usages and determine whether compatibility implications need to be addressed. Done means RealOutput() exposes the requested output variable without breaking the library's existing model behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100