SciML / SciML/ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl
Why are Thermal[Conductor|Resistor] so different from their Convective* counterparts
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 171
- Forks
- 49
- Avg merge
- 15h 50m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
From a purely mathematical perspective both modes conduction and Convection are indistinguishable, both have the form h * dT.
Why is this not reflected in their implementations. For example:
- Why does not the Thermal* element impose same flow on its ports/connectors?
- Why is Conductive* not based on its Thermal* counterpart?
- Why is the code of these elements so different?
In my view, Convective* (except for the heat flow conditions imposed) are just syntax sugar. Giving a semantic interface that allows the user to express the condition in which the exchange is between a solid and a fluid, but otherwise should not differ form the Conductive* (Thermal*) counterparts. Am I missing something?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file or test is named. Compare the Thermal*, Conductive*, and Convective* element entry points and their port or connector equations, then clarify whether a shared implementation and matching flow constraints are intended. Done should include an agreed design and tests for the desired behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100