SciML / SciML/JumpProcesses.jl

network free solvers

Open
#415 0 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
150
Forks
41
Avg merge
1d 9h
Merged PRs (30d)
28

Description

@TorkelE pointed out that on a multisite phosphorylation benchmark where species can have many phosphorylation states, we are starting to lose performance relative to network-free methods as the number of sites increases (NF methods track individual molecules and their states). It would be worth thinking about how to include such solvers / representations here too, especially in ways that can exploit our current SSA infrastructure.

@TorkelE when you are able to share, could you link the network files and sources?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files or tests are named. Start by obtaining the network files and sources from TorkelE, then study the existing SSA infrastructure and the multisite phosphorylation benchmark; done requires an agreed and implemented network-free solver or representation with benchmark evidence.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.