SciML / SciML/DiffEqNoiseProcess.jl
NoiseProcess type hierarchy
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 62
- Forks
- 32
- Avg merge
- 8h 38m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 16
Description
To implement when which algorithm is compatible with which noise type we need to distinguish between them after creation. Would it be sensibele to make a type system on top of NoiseProcess? The CamelCase names seems already to suggest that we should think of them this way.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the linked SciMLBase.jl pull request and locating the NoiseProcess type definitions in DiffEqNoiseProcess.jl. The issue does not name files, tests, or acceptance criteria; completion would require an agreed type hierarchy that distinguishes noise types for algorithm compatibility.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100