SciML / SciML/ComponentArrays.jl

Make `map` output consistent with the rest of broadcasting

Open
#156 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Julia
Stars
375
Forks
42
Avg merge
7h 25m
Merged PRs (30d)
17

Description

From https://github.com/avik-pal/Lux.jl/pull/109#issuecomment-1198724214

julia> ca = ComponentArray(a=1, b=2)

julia> map((x,y) -> x+y, ca, 1:2) # returns a Vector 
2-element Vector{Int64}:
 2
 4

julia> ca .+ (1:2) # returns a ComponentVector
ComponentVector{Int64}(a = 2, b = 4)

This can probably be fixed with an overload of Base.promote_shape for CombinedAxis.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Reproduce the Julia examples comparing map((x,y) -> x+y, ca, 1:2) with ca .+ (1:2). Start by inspecting CombinedAxis and Base.promote_shape behavior, then verify that map preserves the ComponentVector structure like broadcasting does. Done means the map call returns a ComponentVector with the expected values and existing behavior remains intact.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
julia
Domain
data
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.