Tests for type stability
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Julia
- Stars
- 70
- Forks
- 20
- Avg merge
- 5h 17m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
#102 accidentally introduced fields without type annotations. I'm fixing it right now but it would be good to add systematic checks for this
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing issue #102 and the type-related fields it introduced, then inspect how checks are organized in this repository. Add systematic checks that detect fields without type annotations and confirm that the checks cover the affected definitions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- julia
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100