SSWConsulting / SSWConsulting/SSW.Rules

Can we find ALL rules without Acknowledgments so it's easier to fix?

Open
#489 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
26
Forks
17
Avg merge
14h 39m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

Hi team,

I've seen a few rules with no authors. (e.g. https://www.ssw.com.au/rules/use-interoperability-mechanism-for-com-object)

  1. Can we have a list of all these rules so we can find authors for them (and have no blanks)?
  2. Can you write SQL-like queries against GitHub data? (from @adamcogan )
Screen Shot 2021-04-28 at 4 45 49 PM

Thanks
Tiago

AB#61276

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no source files or tests; start by inspecting the example rule and how rule authors or acknowledgments are represented in SSW.Rules. Done means producing a complete list of rules without acknowledgments and clarifying whether SQL-like queries against GitHub data are supported.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
nextjs, typescript
Domain
content
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.