Rule content editing process to be faster and more independent for major editors

Hi team,

as per my conversation with @bradystroud and Uly (can't @mention Uly 🙁 )

• I expect a lot of rule changes to be just fixing typos, grammar, or simply improving a sentence...
• Also... quite often we need urgent new rules or rule changes (e.g. Adam needs them for a presentation or a video recording)

We should be able to make these simple or urgent internal changes easier... without requiring reviews, approvals, merging, then waiting for the final release.

--

1. Can we create a nice workflow diagram, showing the current step-by-step details for editing a rule? (Including technical GitHub limitations)

2. Then discuss and propose ways to make this workflow simpler?

   • This would be set specifically for major content editors - like Tiago, Uly, Adam... which will have certain permissions.
   • External people and new employees should still wait for approvals, so we need different workflows for each role

AB#60375

Start with the current GitHub rule-editing process described by the issue and the linked AB#60375 work item; document each step and its technical limitations. Done means a workflow diagram and a concrete proposal for separate major-editor versus approval-based paths, with the relevant permissions and release wait documented.