✨ Architecture - Improve JSON Mapping File Process

Requested by: @wicksipedia via YakShaver.ai 🦬
cc: @wicksipedia, @christianmorfordwaitessw, @PothieuG, @adamcogan, @JackDevAU, @ncn-ssw, @kulesy, @Ben0189, @isaaclombardssw, @BrookJeynes, @Calinator444, @Marxoz, @Levijj22, @sethdaily

Hi Team!

  🟥  Watch the video (3 min 28 sec)

  Url from screen share: https://github.com/SSWConsulting/SSW.Rules/issues/1756

Pain

Enhance the process of handling JSON mapping files in the Rules V3 project by leveraging TinaCMS's reference fields to avoid manual copying and improve clarity in issue documentation.

Acceptance Criteria

1. The JSON mapping file process is streamlined using TinaCMS's reference fields.
2. Documentation is updated to clearly explain the process without needing to reference other issues.
3. A checklist is added to issues to ensure clarity and completeness.
4. Acceptance criteria are explicitly stated in each issue.

Screenshot

Figure: Confusion over JSON file creation using Python script without leveraging Tina.io.

Review issue 1756, the linked screen-share video, and the current JSON mapping workflow described in this issue. Start by tracing how TinaCMS reference fields relate to the existing Python script and Rules V3 process. Done means the mapping workflow is streamlined, documentation stands alone, and issues include a completeness checklist with explicit acceptance criteria.