SAP-samples / SAP-samples/btp-developer-guide-cap
XSUAA to AMS clarification
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 97
- Forks
- 37
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The workzone integration is not clear
since we don't rely anymore on role template and role collection, everything is configured in the SCI application under the AMS policy tab.
In Work Zone, you still need to assign your Fiori apps to roles (which translate to RC in the BTP cockpit) and then you need to assign those roles to your site.
I don't see where AMS fits here? If I still need to managed role collection than maybe it's easier to stick with XSUAA
also AMS user assignment, it looks like you have to assign user 1 by 1, what about IAS reusable user group, like a group of 3K of users, I don't want to assign 3000 users to every app policy manually
thanks
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by tracing how Work Zone roles and site assignments relate to the SCI application’s AMS policy tab, then compare the XSUAA, AMS, and IAS user-assignment concepts mentioned in the issue. Done means documenting where AMS fits, whether role collections remain necessary, and how reusable IAS groups can be assigned without manual per-user setup.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- authorization, cloud, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100