RustCrypto / RustCrypto/rustls-rustcrypto
Benchmarks
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 130
- Forks
- 21
- Avg merge
- 18h 6m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Note that RustCrypto performance is generally inferior than ring
I don't think we can state this unless we have benchmarks :)
What should we measure ? We need fruits to fruits comparisons - 🍎 vs 🍏
I'm thinking throughput, session establishment etc stuff - all needs to be in localhost
We need also to use rustls consistently between providers -
I'll take a crack doing some after I finish the internal integration tests which may potentially serve base for the benches as well
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the internal integration tests mentioned in the issue, since they may provide a base for the benchmarks. Define comparable localhost measurements for throughput and session establishment, using rustls consistently between providers; done means benchmark results that support or challenge the performance claim.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- cryptography, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 32/100