RosettaCommons / RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion

Discrepancies in Absolute Coordinates & Missing Side Chains in Output

Open
#271 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
3.1k
Forks
644
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

hi,

I've noticed the following while experimenting with RFdiffusion:

  1. The absolute coordinates of atoms in the output PDB files differ from those in the reference PDB files, even for regions of the structure that have been fixed.

  2. Additionally, the output PDB files only contain backbone atoms, with all side chains removed. Given that side chains have degrees of freedom and are essential for accurate structural modeling, shouldn't they also be fixed in the correct orientation? Even though inverse folding models might be able to infer side-chain positions, it seems counterproductive to lose this information during motif scaffolding.

Question: Is there any known workaround or setting that can preserve the absolute coordinates and retain the side chains?

Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated, thank you!

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No source files or tests are named. Start by reproducing motif scaffolding with RFdiffusion, then compare fixed-region coordinates and atom records between the reference and output PDB files; done means establishing whether a documented setting or workaround preserves absolute coordinates and side chains.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
bioinformatics, machine-learning
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.