RosettaCommons / RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion
Potentials result in pull to C-terminal end of protein?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3.1k
- Forks
- 644
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I was trying to generate N-terminal homodimeric caps with the following code below:
/rds/general/user/dp5117/home/RFdiffusion/scripts/run_inference.py
inference.symmetry="C2"
inference.num_designs=10
inference.output_prefix=${Results}/${pdb_filename}_designs/${pdb_filename}length${length}
'potentials.guiding_potentials=["type:olig_contacts,weight_intra:1.0,weight_inter:0.1"]'
potentials.olig_intra_all=True
potentials.olig_inter_all=True
potentials.guide_scale=2
potentials.guide_decay=quadratic
inference.input_pdb=$pdb_filepath
"contigmap.contigs=[$length/A24-228/0 $length/B24-228/0]" \
However, this resulted in the capping regions expanding outwards to the C-terminal interface, see image below.
Removing the potentials flags rectified this and I ended up with plausible N-terminal interfaces.
Curious to see what the authors may think is going on?
DP
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with scripts/run_inference.py and trace the supplied symmetry, contigmap, and potentials options, especially olig_contacts and guide_decay. Reproduce the C2 design with and without the potentials flags and compare the resulting N- and C-terminal interfaces shown in the report. Done means identifying why the potentials shift the cap or confirming a configuration or modeling issue and documenting the resolution.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100