RoaringBitmap / RoaringBitmap/roaring
Compare ParOr benchmarks between Go and Java Roaring
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 262
- Avg merge
- 2h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
Compare ParOr benchmarks between Go and Java Roaring parallel aggregation algorithms.
This would give us insights on where each of the implementations could be improved. In this project I'm particularly interested in roaring.ParOr.
cc/ @richardstartin
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the Go roaring.ParOr implementation and the corresponding Java Roaring parallel aggregation benchmarks. Run comparable ParOr benchmarks in both projects and record the results. Done means a documented comparison that identifies where each implementation could be improved.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go, java
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100