RoaringBitmap / RoaringBitmap/roaring-rs
Make proptests generic over `BitSetValueTree`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 957
- Forks
- 119
- Avg merge
- 3d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Then we get the same test suite for free on
RoaringTreemapStoreArrayStoreBitmapStoreRunStore(future) #12
AND we'd be able to add new generator/shink strategies, for example generating two Stores such that lhs is a RunStore and rhs is an ArrayStore, we could trivially test set ops for every combination!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the property tests and the BitSetValueTree implementation, then trace how the current suite is tied to one bit-set type. Done means the same tests can run for RoaringTreemap, Store, ArrayStore, and BitmapStore, with room for RunStore and cross-type set-operation strategies.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- testing-qa
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100