Adding standard-conforming iterators for C++

A few months ago I added a standards-conforming iterator to the C++ interface for 32bit croaring. It's always frustrated me that the iterator support in the C++ interface isn't "right". For example, a conforming forward iterator needs to be an lvalue, but this means an iterator struct can't actually be empty/have no content. The "trick" of using a static "empty" iterator for end() also really bothers me as just "icky" :).

I find this page invaluable for considering iterator classes in C++: https://cplusplus.com/reference/iterator/

The iterators we have are kind of a mishmash of various things but the only type of iterator they actually fully implement is the simple input iterator. All other classes of iterator have something missing.

On the other hand, it's not clear to me that we can implement a "correct" STL iterator without any backward-compatibility issues with what's there now.

What are peoples' thoughts about this.

Review the existing C++ iterator support for the 32-bit CRoaring interface and compare it with the referenced C++ iterator requirements. Determine whether fully standard-conforming iterators can be added without breaking backward compatibility; completion requires an agreed design, not just an isolated edit.