Riddy21 / Riddy21/Friday_Budgeting_Pro
feat(savings): savings goals — set targets with deadlines and track progress
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 1
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Summary
Allow users to define savings goals (target amount + optional deadline) and track progress toward them via chat.
Data model
CREATE TABLE savings_goals (
id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
user_id TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
name TEXT NOT NULL, -- e.g. "Emergency Fund"
target REAL NOT NULL, -- e.g. 10000.00
deadline TEXT, -- ISO date, optional
line_item_id TEXT, -- optional: tie to a specific savings line item
created_at INTEGER,
updated_at INTEGER
);
Goal progress calculation
- Linked to a line item: progress = cumulative savings entries for that line item
- Unlinked: progress is tracked via manual
add_to_savings_goal()updates or inferred from total savings
Example
Emergency Fund
Target: $10,000
Deadline: December 2026
Saved: $4,200 (42%)
Monthly needed to hit target: $633
On track: ✅ (saving $750/mo avg)
Acceptance criteria
- Goals can be created, updated, and deleted
- Progress calculated automatically from linked savings line items
- "Monthly needed" field computed from remaining + deadline
- Deadline optional — shows open-ended progress when absent
- Unit tests
Part of Epic #247
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the savings and chat entry points, the savings line-item handling, and any existing database migration patterns. Use the proposed savings_goals schema and the add_to_savings_goal() path as the starting points, then add unit tests for creation, updates, deletion, linked progress, deadlines, and open-ended goals. Done means all acceptance criteria are covered by tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, sql
- Domain
- backend, databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100