Bisectable needs a better example
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
bisectable
- Dominant language
- Raku
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 16
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
<AlexDaniel> bisect: old=2015.12 new=HEAD exit 1 if (^∞).grep({ last })[5] // 0 == 4
<bisectable6> AlexDaniel, On both starting points (old=2015.12 new=932b10f) the exit code is 0 and the output is identical as well
<bisectable6> AlexDaniel, Output on both points: «»
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at Bisectable.p6 line 39 and review the bisect example quoted in the issue. Check how the example behaves at the old and new revisions, then identify what makes a replacement example clearer and verify that it distinguishes the revisions as intended.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100