Evalable should produce output that's identical to what camelia produces
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
evalable
- Dominant language
- Raku
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 16
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-06-07#i_14701591
In short, people forget m: prefix or write m: without whitespace, and then wonder why they get gists in response.
I don't know, either we should make cameliable or make evalable act like camelia.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the linked IRC discussion and comparing the reported behavior of evalable and camelia, especially handling of the m: prefix and whitespace. Clarify which command should be authoritative and what identical output means before locating the relevant bot entry points; done means the chosen behavior is specified and consistently produced.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100