QuantumBFS / QuantumBFS/quantum.harness
[challenge]: Closed-form spectrum of the physical defect-sector Majorana matrix
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 66
- Forks
- 93
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Released by
Kun Chen, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Contact email
chenkun0228@gmail.com
Method
Other
Challenge issue
Background
In the quantum asymmetric exclusion process of Robertson and Essler, operator space fragments into dynamically invariant sectors. On a defect-free segment the Lindblad generator becomes quadratic in Majorana superoperators, reducing the many-body dynamics to the spectrum of a finite $2M\times2M$ matrix.
Let $K\in\mathbb{C}^{M\times M}$ have entries $K_{jk}=\delta_{j,k-1}$, and define
C=\begin{pmatrix}
J_-&-2iJ_+\\
0&J_-
\end{pmatrix}.
The physical defect-sector matrix is
A=K\otimes C-K^T\otimes C^T,
with the tensor-product basis ordered by site and the two Majorana components. Hence $A^T=-A$.
The nonnegative rates obey
2J_+=J_1+J_2=J_3+J_4,\qquad 2J_-=J_1-J_2.
On the balanced line, $J_3=J_4$, equivalently
J_1=J_++J_-,\quad J_2=J_+-J_-,\quad
J_3=J_4=J_+,\quad J_+\ge|J_-|.
The source diagonalized the physical $A$ numerically and found an analytic spectrum only after replacing it by a distinct, unphysical boundary-deformed matrix $A'$. The closed-form spectrum of the undeformed physical matrix was left open.
Research objective
Give explicit closed-form analytic expressions for the complete multiset of all $2M$ eigenvalues of $A$, for every positive integer $M$ and every admissible balanced-rate parameter choice.
The answer must include:
- algebraic multiplicities;
- explicit indexing;
- branch conventions;
- degeneracies and exceptional parameter cases; and
- the mandatory $\lambda\leftrightarrow-\lambda$ and complex-conjugation symmetries.
An unevaluated characteristic polynomial, “the roots of” a determinant, an unsolved recurrence or quantization condition, formulas only for $A'$, asymptotics, or isolated numerical instances do not satisfy the challenge. Eigenvectors and Jordan structure are outside scope unless needed to define the eigenvalues correctly.
Success and verification gate
The submitted closed-form spectrum is itself the result. An independent reviewer should be able to:
- form the undeformed matrix $A$ directly from the definition;
- check that the formula produces exactly $2M$ roots with the stated algebraic multiplicities;
- verify for general $M$ and admissible parameters the exact identity
\det(\lambda I-A)=\prod_{j=1}^{2M}(\lambda-\lambda_j),
or an equivalent named terminating recurrence identity;
4. audit branches, degeneracies, and exceptional rate choices; and
5. compare exact small-$M$ characteristic polynomials as secondary checks.
The solver's derivation and search process need not be reconstructed. The reviewer primarily checks the formula against the exact characteristic-polynomial identity.
Why this may lead to research output
The result would close a concrete structural gap in an exact solution of a fragmented open quantum many-body system, exposing every defect-sector mode and its dependence on system size and rates. The scope is intentionally precise: it resolves this Majorana-matrix family, not every fragmented Lindbladian or the model's broader entanglement and initial-state questions.
Current status and references
The problem was audited on 28 July 2026 and assessed as likely open with medium confidence. A 2024 thesis by the source paper's first author retains the same limitation and boundary deformation; the inspected citation chain through 2026 does not supply the physical spectrum.
- J. A. Robertson and F. H. L. Essler, Exact solution of a quantum asymmetric exclusion process with particle creation and annihilation.
- J. A. Robertson, Quantum quenches in closed and open spin chains: a thesis in two parts.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start from the displayed definitions of K, C, and the undeformed matrix A, then consult the Robertson–Essler paper and cited thesis for the existing boundary-deformed result. Done means an explicit formula for all 2M eigenvalues, including multiplicities, branches, degeneracies, exceptional rates, and required symmetries, verified against the characteristic polynomial for general M.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100