QuantumBFS / QuantumBFS/quantum.harness

[challenge]: Convergence-rate theory for fermionic hierarchies

Open
#239 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

accepted autoresearch challenge
Dominant language
Python
Stars
66
Forks
93
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Released by

Jie Wang (AMSS, Chinese Academy of Sciences) & Jin-Guo Liu (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou))

Contact email

cacate0129@gmail.com

Method

Other

Challenge issue

Difficulty: ★★★ (rated by Jie Wang)

Background

The 2026 Pauli-algebra convergence rates (arXiv:2605.29959, arXiv:2606.04940) have no fermionic counterpart. Fermionic SDP lower bounds are the mathematical core of variational electronic structure (SDP relaxations for condensed matter: arXiv:1106.5275, arXiv:1106.4966), which has never had an a priori accuracy statement for a polynomial-cost method.

Research objective

Establish the CAR-algebra analogue: explicit finite-level error bounds for NC-SOS relaxations of interacting-fermion Hamiltonians (Hubbard-class) in the Majorana monomial algebra. The Pauli proof's almost-reproducing-kernel construction has a natural Clifford/Majorana counterpart (Krawtchouk → weight-graded analogues); parity superselection plays the role of the even-weight restriction, suggesting the fermionic case may be cleaner than odd-weight Pauli.

Verification plan

  • Success gate: a proved rate whose predictions contain the computed hierarchy errors on free-fermion and integrable Hubbard instances (exact reference values) across all accessible levels and sizes — containment failures falsify instantly.
  • Hope signal: a rate for quadratic-plus-weak-interaction regimes only — already the first fermionic guarantee.
  • Pivot signal: Majorana kernels provably lack the spectral gap driving the Pauli argument — the obstruction theorem redirects to weighted/twisted kernels.

Why this may lead to research output

A rate theorem would give quantum chemistry an a-priori accuracy statement for SDP lower bounds — and would fix which relaxation level any quantum-advantage claim in electronic structure must beat.

References

  1. arXiv:2605.29959; arXiv:2606.04940 (Pauli-algebra rates).
  2. Baumgratz, Plenio, Lower bounds for ground states of condensed matter systems, arXiv:1106.5275.
  3. Barthel, Hübener, Solving condensed-matter ground-state problems by semidefinite relaxations, arXiv:1106.4966.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No repository files, tests, or entry points are named. Start with the cited Pauli-rate papers and fermionic SDP references, then formulate the CAR/Majorana rate and compare it with free-fermion and integrable Hubbard hierarchy errors at accessible levels. Done means a proved bound containing those errors, or a documented obstruction and pivot.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
15/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.