Quantisan / Quantisan/docker-clojure
Question: does it make sense to merge lein and tools.deps images?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Dockerfile
- Stars
- 203
- Forks
- 34
- Avg merge
- 21m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
Given that the image size is absolutely dominated by JDK (~300 Mb uncompressed), would it be reasonable to ship both Leiningen (~15 Mb uncompressed) and tools.deps (around the same but also needs Git installed) in the single image, kinda like what is done for latest? There are a couple of projects that use both on CI and such projects could benefit from such a change. Are there any drawbacks apart from increased image size?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing image definitions and the arrangement used for latest, then compare the Leiningen and tools.deps image contents, including the JDK and Git size costs mentioned here. Done means reaching a maintainer-backed decision on whether to merge them and, if approved, defining the combined image’s expected contents and trade-offs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- dockerfile
- Domain
- devops
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100