QuantEcon / QuantEcon/lecture-python-programming.fr

Review: numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax.md

Open Beginner friendly
#58 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

audit maintenance
Dominant language
Python
Stars
0
Forks
1
Avg merge
41m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

Part of #40 (Phase 1).

Native-speaker review of numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax.md by @Honaminto.

French (read this) lectures/numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax.md
English source lectures/numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax.md

How to reply. Open a PR editing the French directly — one PR for this lecture, titled e.g. [numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax] Corrections — or leave line comments / suggestion blocks on it. Priorities: meaning errors, wrong technical terms, inconsistent terminology, unnatural French (academic register), anything in code comments that looks wrong. Ignore spacing before : ; ! ?, errors in the English, and the translation: header. A wrong term that recurs belongs on the terminology issue, not here.

Done when a PR by @Honaminto touching this file is merged, or he states here that the lecture needs no change. Either outcome is recorded; nothing is ticked by hand.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Review lectures/numpy_vs_numba_vs_jax.md against the English source at the linked repository. Check meaning, technical terms, terminology consistency, academic French, and code comments while following the stated exclusions. Done when a PR changing this file is merged or the reviewer confirms that no changes are needed.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
numpy, python
Domain
documentation, localization
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
72/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.