QuantEcon / QuantEcon/QuantEcon.py

Big perf gains by converting important methods to numba

Open
#822 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
2.4k
Forks
2.3k
Avg merge
3d 3h
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

Hi QuantEcon team,

I'm Saurabh, building codeflash.ai. I've contributed a few performance optimizations for QuantEcon.py previously. One of the previous feedback was to convert an optimization to numba, we took that feedback and optimized the rest of the library with numba.

We have exciting results to share!

There are a few others as well that I have reviewed and approved. Please take a look.

I would love to contribute these back to QuantEcon.py. Let me know if you have any feedback for the above optimizations? I would love to collaborate with you as I open Pull Requests for these to the main project.

Thanks,
Saurabh

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the referenced PRs for solve_discrete_riccati_system, nnash, and integrate_variable_trajectory, along with the approved open PR list. Confirm with maintainers which optimizations belong in QuantEcon.py and define completion around accepted changes and verification of the reported speedups.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
performance
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.