QuantEcon / QuantEcon/QuantEcon.py
repeated names in directory
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.4k
- Forks
- 2.3k
- Avg merge
- 3d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
There are a lot of repeated names in the list of attributes, filename and then class or function name:

e.g., compute_fixed_point and compute_pf, ECDF and ecdf. We don't really need the module names here. Should they be hidden, perhaps? What's the convention?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file, test, or entry point is named. Start by identifying the component that produces the attribute directory shown in the screenshot, then compare entries such as compute_fixed_point/compute_pf and ECDF/ecdf. Done requires a documented convention and an agreed decision on whether module names should be hidden.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100