QuantConnect / QuantConnect/lean-cli

lean cloud push overwrites read-only shared library files

Open
#661 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
326
Forks
168
Avg merge
3d 50m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

lean cloud push overwrites read-only shared library files

Summary

When a project references a shared library for which the pushing user has read-only (collaborator) access, lean cloud push still uploads the locally cached library files via /files/update, effectively overwriting whatever the library owner has since changed on the cloud. The access control on the library project is not consulted before the push.

Reproduction steps

  1. Create a library project and share it across an organisation as read-only (i.e. other members are added as read-only collaborators, not owners).
  2. A read-only collaborator runs lean cloud pull on a project that references this library → library files are downloaded locally.
  3. The library owner pushes new changes to the library in the cloud.
  4. The read-only collaborator runs lean cloud push on the project (not on the library directly).
  5. Observed: the cloud library files are reverted to the version the read-only collaborator had locally from step 2.
  6. Expected: lean cloud push should skip pushing files for libraries where the current user has read-only access (or the cloud API should reject the write with an appropriate error).

Root cause (hypothesis)

lean cloud push iterates over all local project files, including the contents of every linked library directory, and calls /files/update or /files/create for each. It does not check the authenticated user's role on the library project before pushing library files. The result is that a collaborator who cannot directly write to a library via the web IDE or via lean cloud push <library> can inadvertently overwrite it by pushing the parent project.

Suggested fix

Before pushing library files, retrieve the calling user's access level on each library project (e.g. via /projects/read for the library's project id and checking the collaborator role / access flag). Skip — or error — on any library where the user is not an owner or write collaborator.

A complementary server-side guard on /files/update to enforce the library project's collaborator permissions would provide defence-in-depth regardless of the client.

References

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start at the lean cloud push flow and trace how linked library files reach /files/update or /files/create. Check how /projects/read exposes collaborator access, then reproduce the read-only library scenario. Done means read-only library files are skipped or rejected without overwriting cloud changes, with the relevant push behavior covered by tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
cli, cloud
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
55/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.