Incorrect weak-coupling justification in LSH hadron dynamics tutorial

URL to the relevant tutorial

https://quantum.cloud.ibm.com/docs/en/tutorials/loop-string-hadron-dynamics

Select all that apply

• new content request
• typo
• code bug
• out-of-date content
• broken link
• other

Describe the fix or the content request.

The tutorial incorrectly states:

In the weak-coupling regime ($x\gg1$), the dynamics is dominated by the electric term $H_E$, which favors states with large $n_l$.

From the Hamiltonian

$$
W=H_E+\mu H_M+xH_I,
$$

we see that large $x$ instead makes the off-diagonal term $xH_I$ dominant. This agrees with the original paper. It is in the strong-coupling regime that $H_E$ dominates; there, flux is energetically expensive and the vacuum has $n_l=0$.

Large $n_l$ is a separate modeling choice motivated by a weak-coupling vacuum ansatz. The authors choose a large incoming boundary flux, producing a large, approximately uniform flux across the lattice. This allows flux-dependent hopping prefactors such as

$$
\sqrt{\frac{n_l}{n_l+1}}
$$

to be approximated by one.

Suggested correction

In the weak-coupling regime $x\gg1$, the off-diagonal interaction term $xH_I$ dominates. The weak-coupling vacuum is modeled using a large incoming boundary flux, giving $n_l\gg1$ across the lattice. The resulting $n_l$-dependent hopping prefactors approach one, simplifying $H_I$ to nearest-neighbor hopping on the fermionic qubits.

For new content requests - if the request is accepted, do you want to write the content?

(No answer)