QL-Win / QL-Win/QuickLook

Readest instead of SumatraPDF suggestion

Open
#1,672 9 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

good for a plugin help wanted
Dominant language
C#
Stars
24.7k
Forks
1.3k
Avg merge
4d 7h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

I would like to suggest, if possible, to move away from SumatraPDF plugin and go with Readest based plugin instead.
Readest is an open-source project on Github. For the short period of development, it has evolved so much, that it has left SumatraPDF in the dust. Readest uses WebView2 and with this will be similar to implement, when compared to other plugins. The developer of Readest is doing a tremendous job in immediately fixing all reported bugs and is having new versions sometimes daily.
Readest's handling of EPUB, MOBI, and all digital publications is much more advanced, when compared to SumatraPDF. Extremely complex EPUBs open in Redest instantly, while the same EPUBs take forever to open in SumatraPDF. I think this will be a night and day addition to QuickLook and will enable it to instantly and reliably open any digital publications, of course excluding PDF.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing QuickLook's existing SumatraPDF plugin integration and how a WebView2-based Readest plugin would fit. Compare the EPUB, MOBI, and other digital-publication handling described in the issue, then define the integration scope and acceptance criteria before implementation. Done should mean the replacement reliably opens supported publications while excluding PDF.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
csharp
Domain
desktop
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.