Inline type hints
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 346
- Forks
- 113
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi, I wrote some third party stubs for WebTest for something I was working on and was wondering if there is any interest in merging them into the code base.
I previously wrote stubs for WebOb and contributed them to typeshed and have an open PR to get those merged into the WebOb code base.
I am willing to do the same for WebTest. I do already have a PR open on typeshed for those stubs. But if you're willing to add inline type hints, then it makes more sense to do that, rather than publish a third party stubs package that's going to be obsolete within a short few weeks.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are identified in the issue. First clarify whether WebTest will accept inline type hints and which parts of the codebase are in scope, then compare the proposed stubs with the existing implementation; done should mean the agreed inline hints are merged and the separate typeshed stubs are no longer needed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- testing
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100