Consider implementing wake losses?

Open

#494 opened on Mar 20, 2026 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

status: needs classification type: enhancement

Dominant language: Python
Stars: 402
Forks: 134
PR merge metrics: No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Might be helpful: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/leonardo-alcayaga-45a53551_%F0%9D%90%8F%F0%9D%90%B2%F0%9D%90%85%F0%9D%90%AE%F0%9D%90%A0%F0%9D%90%9A-%F0%9D%90%A2%F0%9D%90%AC-%F0%9D%90%9F%F0%9D%90%A2%F0%9D%90%A7%F0%9D%90%9A%F0%9D%90%A5%F0%9D%90%A5%F0%9D%90%B2-%F0%9D%90%A8%F0%9D%90%A9%F0%9D%90%9E%F0%9D%90%A7-share-7440432871623790592-jehQ?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAB8DF0MB0-FX7QWWMkARciywip0uDAt9ngI

To discuss..

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No source files, tests, or entry points are identified in the issue. First review the linked discussion and repository structure to determine where wind-power calculations belong; done would require an agreed wake-loss design, implementation scope, and tests, none of which are specified here.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack: python
Domain: data
Issue type: Feature
Difficulty: 5/5
Estimated time: Over a week
Activity status: Stale
Clarity: Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness: 20/100

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.