Allowing `type`s to define Python classes
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 16.2k
- Forks
- 1k
- Avg merge
- 2d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 66
Description
Currently, the only way to create a Python class is with a struct. However, using a type to define a class could remove a lot of boilerplate from creating similar classes.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing how PyO3 currently creates Python classes from Rust structs and the relevant Python C API support, then define the API and implementation scope needed for types to define classes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, rust
- Domain
- api, backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100