Hypothesis: Pot surface rugosity is meaningful...
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
If our working hypothesis that we want the fastest flow possible is true, then, even though the velocitys are small, a polished pot surface or even a surface with riblets ought to be testable superior. Creating a metalpot with riblets might be beyond our current 3D metal printing capabilities, but we could easily simply "grind-and-buff" a pot with dremel. We would have to have two identical pots, and then carefully polish one and leave the other rough.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the issue body, which proposes testing two identical pots: one carefully polished and one left rough. Determine whether this physical experiment is within the project's scope; done would mean carrying out the comparison and documenting whether surface rugosity affects flow.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100